Savagery and Eloquence wrote:I've only seen 6 of the movies. They don't even come close.
Yeah, the first six books were way better than the movies. They just changed too much and left too much out of the movies. But the seventh movie was much more faithful to the book. I read all the books, but my partner had only seen the movies. So much character development and so many details were left out of the first six movies, that he felt kind of lost while watching the seventh movies. We actually paused it a lot so that I could fill him in on things that had happened in the previous books but were left out or changed in the movies.
Luna Tsukino wrote:Okay... I don't mind Harry Potter, but to me, JK Rowling doesn't come close to hundreds of other Childrens authors. The likes of CS Lewis, and Roald Dahl are much greater. The Story for harry potter isn't bad... and it has some nice story elements, but the writing is terrible.
When you read a good book(or even watch a good film) you find yourself pulled into story and you are stood side by side with the character living the story yourself. You just don't get that with Harry Potter. If I was pulled into the story of Harry Potter, I'd physically punch the Characters, Harry being the primary one.
I think that dedicating a literature class to a mediocre series of books, is more a case of jumpng on the Harry Potter Craze Band Wagon rather then having a literature class to show how good the Harry Potter books are.
I loved the Harry Potter series, but I don't entirely disagree with you either.
I found myself having trouble relating to a lot of the characters (Harry included) because the way they responded to things was often very different from how I think I would have responded.
I think this probably is a case of jumping on the craze bandwagon. I'm not sure it's a class that will stand the test of time and still be offered 50 years from now, you know? But I don't necessarily think it's a bad class to offer right now either. I think the Harry Potter series is getting a lot of kids and teens to read a lot more than they otherwise would have. So I wouldn't be surprised if the class was especially popular with young people who became avid readers thanks to Harry Potter or with education majors who maybe want to discuss the series in depth with their own students.
I would have considered taking it if they offered it when I was in college. But if I had to choose between a Harry Potter or Roald Dahl class, I would have gone for Roald Dahl without even having to think twice about it!